Native Title Claim Areas derived from crown parcels (superceded by REGNTCREG)
dataset:
CROWN_NT_CLM
Parcels of land that have been determined to have a Native Title Claim by the Native Title Unit within Crown Land Management
as enetered into PORTAL.
WARNING: NOT UPDATED SINCE 2004
|
Citation proposal Citation proposal
(2015) Native Title Claim Areas derived from crown parcels (superceded by REGNTCREG) Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions https://dev-metashare.maps.vic.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/5c03a4f1-bb37-5131-afd1-1437f337a8d9 |
- Description
- Temporal
- Spatial
- Maintenance
- Format
- Contacts
- Keywords
- Constraints
- Lineage
- Metadata Constraints Metadata Constraints
- Quality
- Acquisition Info
- Raster Data Details
- Raster Type Details
- Point Cloud Data Details
- Contour Data Details
- Survey Details
Description
- Title
- Native Title Claim Areas derived from crown parcels (superceded by REGNTCREG)
- Alternate title
- CROWN_NT_CLM
- Supplemental Information
- Related Documents: None
- Status
- Planned
Maintenance
- Maintenance and update frequency
- Irregular
Format
- Title
- Format: Primary - PORTAL and vicmap Location:limsp and sysx Backup: ITT Backup Format: ArcInfo CGDL Location: Unix eureka:/cdb_mpv/lvic-gmpv Backup: ITT Backup 1
Contacts
Point of contact
Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions
-
Lane Rob Mr
(Manager, Geoscience Systems)
GPO Box 4509
Melbourne
Vic
3001
Australia
Cited responsible party
No information provided.
Cited responsible party
No information provided.
Cited responsible party
No information provided.
Cited responsible party
No information provided.
Keywords
- Topic category
-
- Boundaries
Constraints
Lineage
- Statement
- Dataset Source: PORTAL and Vicmap Parcel Dataset Originality: Derived
- Description
- Obtained PORTAL native title informationabout parcels and joined to vicmap crown in arc &r create_nt_layers_from_lims
Metadata Constraints Metadata Constraints
- Classification
- Unclassified
Quality
Attribute Quality
- Comments
- Good
Positional Accuracy
- Comments
- Good
Conceptual Consistency
- Comments
- Good
Missing Data
- Comments
- Poor - In progress Completeness Verification: Metadata Custodian Review Frequency: yearly Metadata Last Reviewed by Custodian: April 2002
Excess Data
Overviews
Graphic Overview of Data Footprint
Provided by
